The Improvement Option Evaluation (IOE) sits at the heart of PAS2035 retrofit projects. It represents the technical and financial analysis that justifies proposed energy efficiency measures to building owners and stakeholders. Getting it right is essential—not only for project viability, but for compliance with the standard itself.
Understanding the IOE's Purpose
An IOE demonstrates how proposed retrofit measures will improve a building's energy performance and indoor environment quality. It bridges the gap between the surveyed condition of a building and the desired outcome, setting clear baselines and measurable targets. The evaluation must be transparent, robust, and capable of withstanding scrutiny from clients, local authorities, and funding bodies.
Core Components of a Compliant IOE
Baseline Assessment
Begin by establishing a clear baseline of the building's current performance. This should include:
- Existing energy consumption data (where available)
- Current fabric performance characteristics
- Building fabric thermal bridging details
- Ventilation strategy and air tightness levels
- Heating system efficiency and controls
Your baseline must be evidence-based, drawing on survey data and actual performance records rather than assumptions. PAS2035 emphasises the importance of understanding as-built conditions rather than design specifications.
Technical Specification of Measures
For each improvement option proposed, specify:
- Exact materials and products (including U-values and performance data)
- Installation methods and standards to be followed
- Expected lifespan of the measure
- Any warranty or guarantees provided
- Compatibility with existing building elements
Vagueness here undermines credibility. A reference to "wall insulation" is insufficient—specify thickness, type, density, and thermal resistance values. Include manufacturer technical data sheets or third-party certifications where relevant.
Performance Prediction
Demonstrate how each measure will improve performance using recognised calculation methodologies. Most retrofit professionals use SAP (Standard Assessment Procedure) or similar energy modelling tools. Your modelling should:
- Account for interaction effects between measures
- Include realistic occupancy assumptions
- Reflect the building's actual orientation and exposure
- Consider seasonal variations in performance
- Show carbon savings or energy consumption reductions clearly
Be transparent about limitations in your modelling. If assumptions differ from standard practice, justify why.
Cost Analysis
Provide a detailed cost breakdown for each option, including:
- Material costs with current market quotations
- Labour costs with labour rates documented
- Associated works (scaffolding, temporary measures, etc.)
- Professional fees where applicable
- Contingency allowances (typically 10-15% for retrofit work)
Cost estimates should reflect genuine procurement research, not generic benchmarks. Building owners will scrutinise these figures closely.
Comparing Options
PAS2035 requires consideration of multiple improvement options. Your evaluation should present each option using consistent criteria:
- Energy performance improvement (kWh/year reduction or percentage improvement)
- Carbon savings (tonnes CO₂e/year)
- Cost per unit of energy saved
- Alignment with building performance targets
- Impact on indoor environment quality (moisture risk, thermal comfort)
- Disruption and programme implications
This allows clients to make informed decisions about which options best suit their priorities and constraints.
Critical Compliance Considerations
Moisture and Condensation Risk
PAS2035 emphasises that energy improvements must not increase moisture risks. Your IOE should demonstrate:
- Hygrothermal modelling where appropriate
- Condensation risk assessment for sensitive details
- Integration with any required ventilation improvements
Building Pathology
Address existing issues that retrofit work might exacerbate. If surveys reveal damp, structural movement, or other defects, your IOE should explain how proposed measures account for these.
Overheating Risk
Particularly for summer performance in improved buildings, assess whether measures could increase overheating risk. This is increasingly important for residential buildings and should be addressed explicitly in your evaluation.
Documentation and Sign-Off
Your IOE documentation should be clear enough for a competent third party to follow your logic and verify your assumptions. Include:
- Survey photographs and plans
- Calculation workings and methodology statements
- Source documents for material specifications and costs
- Professional qualifications of the evaluator
A compliant IOE isn't simply a technical document—it's evidence of thorough professional practice that stands up to external review.